<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Object pooling in Python</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devpicayune.com/entry/object-pooling-in-python/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devpicayune.com/entry/object-pooling-in-python</link>
	<description>picayune: of little value or importance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:59:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Corfman</title>
		<link>http://www.devpicayune.com/entry/object-pooling-in-python/comment-page-1#comment-23997</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Corfman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devpicayune.com/?p=148#comment-23997</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the good suggestions.

Do you have a suggestion on how to obtain the benefits of pooling (object reuse) with these approaches? My use of partition was to perform in-place modification of the list, but also to keep track of the unused objects for reuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the good suggestions.</p>
<p>Do you have a suggestion on how to obtain the benefits of pooling (object reuse) with these approaches? My use of partition was to perform in-place modification of the list, but also to keep track of the unused objects for reuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Artemenko</title>
		<link>http://www.devpicayune.com/entry/object-pooling-in-python/comment-page-1#comment-23996</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Artemenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devpicayune.com/?p=148#comment-23996</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it better to use:

    while end:
        end = filter(Shot.update, end)

Instead this ugly handmade &#039;partition&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it better to use:</p>
<p>    while end:<br />
        end = filter(Shot.update, end)</p>
<p>Instead this ugly handmade &#8216;partition&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i0</title>
		<link>http://www.devpicayune.com/entry/object-pooling-in-python/comment-page-1#comment-23994</link>
		<dc:creator>i0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devpicayune.com/?p=148#comment-23994</guid>
		<description>If you care about reference integrity then why not modify list in situ?

while lst: lst[:] = [x for x in lst if update_object(x)]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you care about reference integrity then why not modify list in situ?</p>
<p>while lst: lst[:] = [x for x in lst if update_object(x)]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
